Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: too much testing?

by rvosa (Curate)
on Sep 30, 2005 at 19:29 UTC ( #496496=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to too much testing?

I'm not sure if I understand this correctly, but couldn't you do:
ok(! $foo->getDetails( PARAM_ONE => 1234 ), 'missing parameter');

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: too much testing?
by geektron (Curate) on Sep 30, 2005 at 20:17 UTC
    because the module being tested  croaks when parameters are missing, that doens't catch the intended failure condition.

    the eval is the closest without trying Test::Exception.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://496496]
help
Chatterbox?
[erix]: the neighbours (a nat.hist. museum) have a narwhal skull with *2* tusks
[erix]: ( also: UniCorn Throne )
[zentara]: erix I hope both tusks pointed in the same direction :-)
LanX "♪..♫ Last night a DJ killed my wife ♪..♫ "
zentara...oO 1 more reason I prefer Perl to Python is I can't believe how long Python takes to compile, and you can't disable the myriad of tests
[LanX]: so that's where you've been the last two years? Compiling Python?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-03-30 16:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (361 votes). Check out past polls.