Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: If I was forced to use only one kind of loop for the rest of my days it would be a

by Moron (Curate)
on Oct 04, 2005 at 11:25 UTC ( #497208=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: If I was forced to use only one kind of loop for the rest of my days it would be a
in thread If I was forced to use only one kind of loop for the rest of my days it would be a

(Updated) I rather feel some people would regret their choices. Only recursion can replace all the others, although I voted for for, because recursion is not technically a loop and in many replacement scenarios it would need some horrible overworking to overcome certain scoping issues, but for has enough machinery to replace everything else except recursion. For example, while (condition) is functionally the same as for (;condition;) and do {} while (condition) could be replaced by for (my $first = 1; $first or condition; $first=0) {}
  • Comment on Re^2: If I was forced to use only one kind of loop for the rest of my days it would be a
  • Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://497208]
help
Chatterbox?
[pryrt]: The mismatched ones have a Jan 23 2017 Last-Modified header -- I wonder if they rezipped them and forgot to update the sha1
[stevieb]: RT ticket for the csum mismatch of various versions of Strawberry Perl

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-03-29 21:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (353 votes). Check out past polls.