Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Good software

by robin (Chaplain)
on Oct 23, 2005 at 21:56 UTC ( #502336=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: RFC hierarchic modelling documentation
in thread RFC hierarchic modelling documentation

2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

By that criterion, perl is definitely not good software. I guess that shows that (1) is a fair bit more important than (2). :-)

(Sorry for the topic drift.)


Comment on Good software
Re: Good software
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 23, 2005 at 23:10 UTC
    Oh, most definitely! The code for the perl program most definitely is not maintainable. That, in fact, was a large part of the initial impetus for Perl6, way back when.

    And, yes, (1) is much more important that (2). If it doesn't work, it doesn't matter if it's maintainable. :-)


    My criteria for good software:
    1. Does it work?
    2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://502336]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-09-30 12:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (368 votes), past polls