Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Can I please have *simple* modules?

by Mutant (Priest)
on Nov 23, 2005 at 10:28 UTC ( #511047=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Can I please have *simple* modules?
in thread Can I please have *simple* modules?

I agree, the pollution isn't really an issue at this stage. I don't really bother browsing CPAN at all. If I need a module for a specific task, I simply ask other people for recommendations. The cream does rise to the top; a good example is with date modules. A couple of years ago, there was a huge slew of them, all with various pros and cons, and most with some issues. Now, I wouldn't really think of using or recommending anything other than DateTime - it's the DBI of date modules.

If there are major issues with existing modules, then I don't think people can complain if you release another one. Especially if you can't get the existing modules patched, and you put a note in the POD saying something like "Why another XXXX module?" and clearly lay out your reasons for re-inventing the wheel.


Comment on Re^4: Can I please have *simple* modules?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://511047]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-07 00:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (86 votes), past polls