Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Can I please have *simple* modules?

by Mutant (Priest)
on Nov 23, 2005 at 10:28 UTC ( #511047=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Can I please have *simple* modules?
in thread Can I please have *simple* modules?

I agree, the pollution isn't really an issue at this stage. I don't really bother browsing CPAN at all. If I need a module for a specific task, I simply ask other people for recommendations. The cream does rise to the top; a good example is with date modules. A couple of years ago, there was a huge slew of them, all with various pros and cons, and most with some issues. Now, I wouldn't really think of using or recommending anything other than DateTime - it's the DBI of date modules.

If there are major issues with existing modules, then I don't think people can complain if you release another one. Especially if you can't get the existing modules patched, and you put a note in the POD saying something like "Why another XXXX module?" and clearly lay out your reasons for re-inventing the wheel.


Comment on Re^4: Can I please have *simple* modules?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://511047]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-21 06:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (104 votes), past polls