Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re^5: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

by Your Mother (Bishop)
on Dec 04, 2005 at 07:32 UTC ( #513919=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
in thread "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

I agree on the basic premise: simple, or simplistic, Perl should not be frowned on; unless it's for a bank or a million hit per day site or something. But simple does not equal wrong or sloppy. I wrote a lot of crappy, na´ve code myself that got mountains of work done without, for the most part, incident while boosting the reputation of Perl in the non-techies around me who were unable to detect the odor of code but were able to see how fast Perl could do things. So I know exactly how valuable even bad Perl can be.

It's possible to teach simplistically without teaching incorrect things. It's also much harder to relearn something you were originally taught wrong than to take the time and effort to learn something right the first try. Once something goes through a publisher and has an ISBN attached, it's open for stronger critique than if it were just some dusty corner of the Internet.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
by chanio (Priest) on Dec 06, 2005 at 14:16 UTC

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://513919]
LanX orders pop corn
[erix]: ha ha, you missed it
[shmem]: LanX can get the logs from cbstream at any time from me.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-03-19 21:29 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (246 votes). Check out past polls.