Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

by Your Mother (Canon)
on Dec 04, 2005 at 07:32 UTC ( #513919=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
in thread "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

I agree on the basic premise: simple, or simplistic, Perl should not be frowned on; unless it's for a bank or a million hit per day site or something. But simple does not equal wrong or sloppy. I wrote a lot of crappy, na´ve code myself that got mountains of work done without, for the most part, incident while boosting the reputation of Perl in the non-techies around me who were unable to detect the odor of code but were able to see how fast Perl could do things. So I know exactly how valuable even bad Perl can be.

It's possible to teach simplistically without teaching incorrect things. It's also much harder to relearn something you were originally taught wrong than to take the time and effort to learn something right the first try. Once something goes through a publisher and has an ISBN attached, it's open for stronger critique than if it were just some dusty corner of the Internet.


Comment on Re^5: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
Re^6: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl
by chanio (Priest) on Dec 06, 2005 at 14:16 UTC

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://513919]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-09-23 21:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (241 votes), past polls