Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

by Anonymous Monk
on Dec 06, 2005 at 20:17 UTC ( #514628=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to "Baby" Perl versus "Bad" Perl

This article has prompted me to look back at some of the stuff I wrote four years ago as a "baby". What strikes me about my baby code is:

1) Many of the comments were for my benefit as a "baby".
2) I did indeed use lots of simple statements.
3) I did avoid the use of the perlish symbols, $! and so on, and used "use English" and English names instead.
4) I wrote alot of subroutines that implemented funtionality in other languages and systems that I was comfortable using and knew well, rather than learn the perl or unix way of doing things. This was a matter of expedience. I had to get the job done quickly and this helped. In retrospect the code looks just awful and could be improved.
5) I did use "use strict;" and -w

I'd say that it's fair to castigate someone for doing things badly if it's apparent that they have no desire to do things well and to learn, but give the "babies" a break as they are mostly just trying to grow up.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://514628]
help
Chatterbox?
and the questions are moot...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-06-24 19:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (562 votes). Check out past polls.