Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Config::Std multi-part problem

by bibliophile (Parson)
on Dec 13, 2005 at 15:36 UTC ( #516335=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Config::Std multi-part problem

For what it's worth, I'd recommend switching to XML::Simple unless you need to access existing INI-type files. I've found it to be much more powerful; it allows you to structure your config data to suit your needs (eg: repeated elements, multi-level nesting, and so on).

-- WARNING: You are logged into reality as root.
Comment on Re: Config::Std multi-part problem
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Config::Std multi-part problem
by carcassonne (Pilgrim) on Dec 14, 2005 at 13:33 UTC
    I do not access existing INI-type files, but I do access INI-type users ! ;-))

    For a more complex configuration file module, there's Config::Standard which offers a lot of options, in XML style.

      Correction: That's 'Config::General' instead of 'Config:Std'

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://516335]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (10)
As of 2016-04-29 13:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    :nehw tseb si esrever ni gnitirW

    Results (441 votes). Check out past polls.