Re^2: Simplifying for loop and applying multiple push function

by VSarkiss (Monsignor)

on Dec 14, 2005 at 21:22 UTC ( #516768=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

To my way of thinking, it's simpler to write:

@one = values %hash;
@two = keys %hash;
[download]

Even though the net result is the same.

Just wanted to show another WTDI.

Update
Whoops, Roy Johnson is right, this is equivalent only in some circumstances.

Comment on Re^2: Simplifying for loop and applying multiple push function Download Code
Re^3: Simplifying for loop and applying multiple push function by Roy Johnson (Monsignor) on Dec 14, 2005 at 21:23 UTC
That's only the same if @one and @two started out empty. Caution: Contents may have been coded under pressure.	[reply]
Re^4: Simplifying for loop and applying multiple push function by diotalevi (Canon) on Dec 14, 2005 at 23:40 UTC
Why does it matter whether @one or @two are empty beforehand? Won't the status of the hash and the arrays be identical regardless?	[reply]
Re^5: Simplifying for loop and applying multiple push function by eric256 (Parson) on Dec 14, 2005 at 23:58 UTC
How about if @one and @two arn't empty. The other answers don't empty them, this one clears out any previous values, which may or may not be desired. ___________ Eric Hodges $_='y==QAe=e?y==QG@>@?iy==QVq?f?=a@iG?=QQ=Q?9'; s/(.)/ord($1)-50/eigs;tr/6123457/- \/\|\\\_\n/;print;	[reply]

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://516768]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (12)

As of 2013-05-24 08:28 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?