Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Passing Params

by sutch (Curate)
on Jan 17, 2001 at 00:54 UTC ( #52351=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Passing Params

Try passing $query to your subroutine.


Comment on Re: Passing Params
Re: Re: Passing Params
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 17, 2001 at 01:00 UTC
    Would passing $query to the subroutine have the fastest execution of the above methods?
      I would tend to think that passing $query (which is a reference to an existing CGI query object) is much faster than creating a hash or another new CGI query object.
      From where I sit, yes. The overhead of creating a new CGI object is not trivial. It has to read the query string or STDIN (if it can, I don't remember offhand if it caches it) to get parameters, setting things up to be retrieved at will.

      Creating a hash means allocating memory and hashing keys you may or may not use.

      Passing in $query means dereferencing the object to call a method on it.

      Depending on how many parameters you have and how many things you need to call and if you can get by with sticking things in a hash just once and you don't want sticky fields behavior that CGI.pm does so nicely, I'd give the edge to passing in $query. Sometimes I pass a hash.

      This is unlikely to be the largest bottleneck in your program, however.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://52351]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2015-07-06 23:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (85 votes), past polls