Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: 'grouping' substrings?

by revdiablo (Prior)
on Feb 01, 2006 at 16:42 UTC ( #527108=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: 'grouping' substrings?
in thread 'grouping' substrings?

I dont know whether using $& is effecient or not.

Using $& is not efficient, and usually to be avoided. See the entry in perlvar for details.

Update: perhaps I was a bit imprecise. I'd say something that "imposes a considerable performance penalty on all regular expression matches" is inefficient, but I guess it depends on what type of inefficiency we're talking about.


Comment on Re^2: 'grouping' substrings?
Re^3: 'grouping' substrings?
by ikegami (Pope) on Feb 01, 2006 at 16:52 UTC

    That's not exactly true. $& is only inefficient if you have another regexp in your program which doesn't capture.

    However, it's use is discouraged, since captures can perform the same task without the "effect at a distance" of $&.

    In this case, just replace $& with $1, and you're set.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://527108]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-12-28 12:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (181 votes), past polls