Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: in monktitlebar, link to sections by id?

by VSarkiss (Monsignor)
on Feb 07, 2006 at 20:46 UTC ( #528624=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to in monktitlebar, link to sections by id?

Well, the monastery has come far from its Everything Engine roots, but linking by name is still a key aspect of the site design. As a matter of fact, I'd like to see its use expanded rather than reduced; I really prefer to say VSarkiss instead of 72267. It's just that a lot of our node names aren't easily linked, not like on Everything2.

Granted, there are cases, such as when writing Site Docs, that id numbers work better, but for widely visible nodes like those on the monkbar, I'd prefer to keep using names.


Comment on Re: in monktitlebar, link to sections by id?
Re^2: in monktitlebar, link to sections by id?
by jdporter (Canon) on Feb 07, 2006 at 21:09 UTC

    I'd like to agree with you. It sounds really nice. But... Tutorials doesn't work so well in practice.

    I think the underlying point is that linking by title is a great convenience for users writing user-level nodes, people talking in the cb, and so on. I totally agree with that. But I don't think that corresponds to a principle that linking by title is better for links in/to high-visibility, high-traffic pages under "site" management.

    We're building the house of the future together.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://528624]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-09-01 15:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite cookbook is:










    Results (14 votes), past polls