Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Handling Nodes Worthy of Deletion which contain replies

by ColonelPanic (Friar)
on Jan 20, 2001 at 08:52 UTC ( #53167=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Handling Nodes Worthy of Deletion which contain replies
in thread Handling Nodes Worthy of Deletion which contain replies

I agree. I have a hard time believing that a node could at the same time be worthy of deletion and also elicit replies with high quality information that hasn't been covered just as well elsewhere. If the replies are that good, maybe the node really doesn't need to go. And some of the above solutions, while they may be useful, seem like a lot of work to go through for something of dubious value.

When's the last time you used duct tape on a duct? --Larry Wall


Comment on Re: Re: Handling Nodes Worthy of Deletion which contain replies
Re: Re: Re: Handling Nodes Worthy of Deletion which contain replies
by tye (Cardinal) on Jan 20, 2001 at 10:15 UTC

    You don't have to believe, just open your eyes and you can see it happen. I've seen plenty. I think the cases furtherest on that end are nodes that the author eventually finds "embarrassing" (or just gets sick of being voted down on) and demands that the node be deleted.

    I'm not convinced that such nodes should be deleted (neither am I convinced that they never should be), but I've seen it happen many times. And I think a sensible deletion policy makes more sense than, for example, having the author replace the contents of the node with something completely different (or they just make it blank).

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://53167]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (18)
As of 2014-07-28 19:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (206 votes), past polls