Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: recursive anonymous subroutines

by Zaxo (Archbishop)
on Apr 06, 2006 at 20:05 UTC ( #541713=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to recursive anonymous subroutines

No.

That's too bad, too. I've occasionally wanted something like that myself.

What semantics should that have, do you think? A magical local variable which points to the current block? [Added]: Or extend redo to apply to code blocks?

After Compline,
Zaxo


Comment on Re: recursive anonymous subroutines
Re^2: recursive anonymous subroutines
by ambrus (Abbot) on Apr 06, 2006 at 20:27 UTC

    The J language has something like that, a magical operator called $: which always refers to the innermost verb it is used at.

    However, I don't like that, and don't think it would be a good idea for perl. I'd rather like something like (one form of) the let macro in scheme. The equivalent to this would be something like this in perl: the hypothetical let NAME { BODY } ARGS could be equivalent to do { my sub NAME { BODY }; NAME(ARGS); }, where you can call NAME in the BODY too. Except we'd need a different name instead of let.

    Update: redo wouldn't help. That only works if you have tail recursion. Redo doesn't return.

      the whole point is not to name the beast. I like the idea of a $thingy :
      (sub {... $thingy->(...) ... )->(args);
      would suit me just fine. Oh well. I can live without it.

      Thanks again.
        It's been done.
        use Sub::Recursive; recursive { ... $REC->(...) ... }->(args)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://541713]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-02 23:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (47 votes), past polls