|more useful options|
Re^2: Small examples of string evalby BrowserUk (Pope)
|on May 13, 2006 at 18:12 UTC||Need Help??|
But each of them knows when to eshew complicated eval-avoidance-schemes, in favour of simplicity.
And before anyone leaps to these authors defense, there is no need. String eval is a tool. Avoiding it where practical is common sense; eshewing at all costs is illogical.
I'm betting that Perl6 will retain string eval in some form.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.