|Keep It Simple, Stupid|
Consideration for others codeby tcf03 (Deacon)
|on May 23, 2006 at 11:00 UTC||Need Help??|
I recently started a new job as a unix admin, a large part of my job is coding perl, which is one of the reasons I took the job. I have been shown a somewhat hefty repository of code. I was hesitant to comment on it since the other (senior) members of the team wrote it. These senior team members comprise a knowledge of UNIX administration that not only cuts wide, but deep. Each is proficent in different areas: C, security TCP/IP, etc... Anyway... When I saw the code I immediatley started rewriting it -largely to suit my own style (at first). I started by adding
fixed what was being complained about and then moved on to replacing large if .. elsif .. else structures, and added some comments. To be fair - it wasn't horrible code, just lacking structure and style, and what I consider a few peices of ugliness thrown in to get a job done quickly when under pressure.
Now I have these programs cleaned up and in some cases not recognisable by the original coders. To boot Ive only touched the tip of the iceberg
How do I present this to them? Do I just say I changed a few things to match my coding style? Do I point out the errors? Keeping in mind that I on some level report to these people, whom I also rely on for their knowledge in areas where I am lacking.
Id also be interested in hearing how others have dealt with similar situations.
"That which we persist in doing becomes easier, not that the task itself has become easier, but that our ability to perform it has improved."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson