Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Bug in HTTP::Cookies?

by damian1301 (Curate)
on Jan 30, 2001 at 21:07 UTC ( #55269=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Bug in HTTP::Cookies?

Well, I'm not too sure if this is a bug or not but looking in my temporary internet files I see that all of the cookies have a 'www.' prefix to the web address. So maybe its just a mandatory thing, or does anyone think otherwise.

Personally, I use CGI::Cookie because it seems like the easiest thing to use for me and the documentation, as always, is fantastic. Maybe that might help you with your problem. Hope so, later

Wanna be perl hacker.
Dave AKA damian

I encourage you to email me

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://55269]
help
Chatterbox?
[hippo]: Why not?
[1nickt]: That's good! I suppose the cpanfile would be the same however the app distro is structured ...
[1nickt]: hippo no reason why not other than wanting to check an assumption :-)
[hippo]: For a self-contained application which can therefore ensure thread safety it seems like a sensible approach.
[choroba]: No, if there are no threads, then the user wants to use MCE. If there are threads, the user can choose.
[1nickt]: choroba Understood. I'm wondering about the logic in a cpanfile. If the perl doesn't support threads, it's easy: require MCE. If the perl does support threads, as you say the user has a choice, so require both? Or, assume that irrespective of the choide

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (13)
As of 2017-10-18 13:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

















    Results (244 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?