Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex

by zentara (Archbishop)
on Jul 23, 2006 at 14:37 UTC ( #563121=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex

Inferiority Complex ??

I would say the opposite. Most Perl hackers, when confronted with another language, respond with "I don't need that sh*t, I already have Perl". :-)


I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. Cogito ergo sum a bum


Comment on Re: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex
Re^2: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex
by explorer (Chaplain) on Jul 23, 2006 at 16:45 UTC
    These two last years, when the chief requested a new task to me, my motto was:
    "Naaah!, I can make it in TWO lines!..."
    This was my work :)
Re^2: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex
by jdrago_999 (Hermit) on Jul 24, 2006 at 17:32 UTC
    Let me explain what I mean by "insecure".

    Never needing to look outside our own box to find a solution sounds like a good thing (and it is), but after years of not having to look elsewhere for solutions, I found myself questioning whether I was missing out!

    It is so rare that I come across a coding problem that requires more than 2 minutes searching CPAN before I discover a solution (or several!).

    Rare. Maybe too rare. So rare in fact that I feel insulated from the rest of the coding world. I have never come across a problem I could not solve with Perl.

    The added bonus of direct access to the source code of CPAN modules has given me an accelerated learning path (compared with Java or .NET) - further perpetuating the cycle of Perl-only knowledge. Or is it?

    I happen to work at a 50/50 Microsoft/OSS shop where everything *we* write is written in VB, and anything *I* write is in Perl. At one point we were going to convert everything to Perl, but nobody else bothered learning Perl. To make a long story short, we're doing .NET now.

    Having spent the last few weeks porting some VBScript code to C#, it's not much different than when I ported something similar from VBScript to Perl. It could be that it was me doing the porting both times, and that both Perl and C# have a C-style syntax.

    In the past I have experimented with C++. Even though it is considered a "real" programming language, I couldn't see how anyone got anything *done* in it - so much that I took for granted with Perl simply was not available to me.

    Learning C# was very different. Even though it has static typing and "One Way To Do It", its garbage collection and the .Net framework class library (analogous to a proprietary CPAN) means I can be more productive than I would be with C++, since most of the wheels I need have already been built and are part of the standard install. (Nice run-on sentence!).

    I look forward to Perl6 with its vast CPAN library, built-in object system, threading and delegation. The "insulation" factor will probably still be there, but since Parrot will promote interoperability, the insulation may be more transparent.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://563121]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-06 08:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (70 votes), past polls