Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks RobOMonk
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex

by zentara (Archbishop)
on Jul 23, 2006 at 14:37 UTC ( #563121=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex

Inferiority Complex ??

I would say the opposite. Most Perl hackers, when confronted with another language, respond with "I don't need that sh*t, I already have Perl". :-)


I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth. Cogito ergo sum a bum


Comment on Re: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex
Re^2: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex
by explorer (Chaplain) on Jul 23, 2006 at 16:45 UTC
    These two last years, when the chief requested a new task to me, my motto was:
    "Naaah!, I can make it in TWO lines!..."
    This was my work :)
Re^2: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex
by jdrago_999 (Hermit) on Jul 24, 2006 at 17:32 UTC
    Let me explain what I mean by "insecure".

    Never needing to look outside our own box to find a solution sounds like a good thing (and it is), but after years of not having to look elsewhere for solutions, I found myself questioning whether I was missing out!

    It is so rare that I come across a coding problem that requires more than 2 minutes searching CPAN before I discover a solution (or several!).

    Rare. Maybe too rare. So rare in fact that I feel insulated from the rest of the coding world. I have never come across a problem I could not solve with Perl.

    The added bonus of direct access to the source code of CPAN modules has given me an accelerated learning path (compared with Java or .NET) - further perpetuating the cycle of Perl-only knowledge. Or is it?

    I happen to work at a 50/50 Microsoft/OSS shop where everything *we* write is written in VB, and anything *I* write is in Perl. At one point we were going to convert everything to Perl, but nobody else bothered learning Perl. To make a long story short, we're doing .NET now.

    Having spent the last few weeks porting some VBScript code to C#, it's not much different than when I ported something similar from VBScript to Perl. It could be that it was me doing the porting both times, and that both Perl and C# have a C-style syntax.

    In the past I have experimented with C++. Even though it is considered a "real" programming language, I couldn't see how anyone got anything *done* in it - so much that I took for granted with Perl simply was not available to me.

    Learning C# was very different. Even though it has static typing and "One Way To Do It", its garbage collection and the .Net framework class library (analogous to a proprietary CPAN) means I can be more productive than I would be with C++, since most of the wheels I need have already been built and are part of the standard install. (Nice run-on sentence!).

    I look forward to Perl6 with its vast CPAN library, built-in object system, threading and delegation. The "insulation" factor will probably still be there, but since Parrot will promote interoperability, the insulation may be more transparent.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://563121]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-04-18 11:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (466 votes), past polls