Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: (OT) safe to mechanize?

by Fletch (Chancellor)
on Aug 03, 2006 at 18:19 UTC ( #565527=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (OT) safe to mechanize?
in thread (OT) safe to mechanize?

Yeah, that'll really help to hit the web site from a bazillion different anonymous proxies . . . so he can log into the site to spider it.


Comment on Re^2: (OT) safe to mechanize?
Re^3: (OT) safe to mechanize?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 04, 2006 at 09:59 UTC

      I'll say this again, slowly. Look at the original question and read again:

      IT DOES NOT HELP TO USE AN ANONYMOUS PROXY TO HIT A SITE TO WHICH YOU MUST SUPPLY A LOGIN TO ACCESS.

      (Presuming of course you don't also have some sort of . . . well I don't want to colour things with the wrong adjective for those hypothetical human rights researchers but I can't think of another, but some sort of "fraudulent" means of obtaining an authentication token which can't be traced back to you).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://565527]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-10-02 14:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    What is your favourite meta-syntactic variable name?














    Results (61 votes), past polls