Re^2: (OT) safe to mechanize?


good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW
	PerlMonks

by Fletch (Chancellor)

on Aug 03, 2006 at 18:19 UTC ( #565527=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

Yeah, that'll really help to hit the web site from a bazillion different anonymous proxies . . . so he can log into the site to spider it.

Comment on Re^2: (OT) safe to mechanize?
Re^3: (OT) safe to mechanize? by Anonymous Monk on Aug 04, 2006 at 09:59 UTC
it helps	[reply]
Re^4: (OT) safe to mechanize? by Fletch (Chancellor) on Aug 04, 2006 at 12:57 UTC
I'll say this again, slowly. Look at the original question and read again: IT DOES NOT HELP TO USE AN ANONYMOUS PROXY TO HIT A SITE *TO WHICH YOU MUST SUPPLY A LOGIN TO ACCESS*. (Presuming of course you don't also have some sort of . . . well I don't want to colour things with the wrong adjective for those hypothetical human rights researchers but I can't think of another, but some sort of "fraudulent" means of obtaining an authentication token which can't be traced back to you).	[reply]

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://565527]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others imbibing at the Monastery: (23)
As of 2013-05-21 15:03 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?