Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re: Clarity in parsing fixed length data.

by hv (Parson)
on Aug 11, 2006 at 10:52 UTC ( #566780=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Clarity in parsing fixed length data.

I find unclear the way the two lists are interleaved. In a style similar to that hinted at in GrandFather's comment, I'd tend to write this as list of hashrefs:

my @TEST_REC_PACK_FIELDS = ( { name => 'status', data => 'n' }, { name => 'time', data => 'n' }, { name => 'date', data => 'N' }, { name => 'code', data => 'a16' }, { name => 'msid', data => 'a10' }, );

At this point you can just as easily construct the list of fieldnames and the unpack string, but it is more self-documenting, and you can easily extend the structures later if you need to start adding validation callbacks and the like.

Hope this helps,


Comment on Re: Clarity in parsing fixed length data.
Download Code

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://566780]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (19)
As of 2015-11-30 15:25 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (774 votes), past polls