Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Robo or Perl?

by explorer (Chaplain)
on Aug 17, 2006 at 18:38 UTC ( #567995=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Robo or Perl?

I used RoboCopy a year ago and It is very good, specially with the automatically daily copy options.

Please use the last version! (XP10, maybe)

And, of course... Write a Perl script to monitoring the existence of robocopy process... sometimes, it crash!

In few words, Robo is best because all options can be set at command line or short config file, include the repetition of daily process... but is not reliable.


Comment on Re: Robo or Perl?
Re^2: Robo or Perl?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 17, 2006 at 19:54 UTC
    Thanks for all your replies and time.

    It sounds like Robo copy is a good option and I assume it has logs to follow if the copy was successful. I will have to wait for them to implement the Robo copy within the next day.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://567995]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-11-29 10:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (204 votes), past polls