|
|
|
| Don't ask to ask, just ask | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Subclassing DBI instead of wrappingby jeffa (Bishop) |
| on Aug 22, 2006 at 17:45 UTC ( [id://568927]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
If you are only wanting to do this because you don't think your original wrapper is as carefully designed as the rest of your project -- AND you will only be changing the internals and not the API -- then no, i don't see very much value in changing it. Aside from that, i also see very little value in writing a wrapper or subclassing DBI in the first place.* There are helper modules out there to handle config data, and i have never needed to retry connecting to the database myself. YMMV of course, but i like DBI straight out of the box. * update: renodino explains this point better than i did. renodino++ jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||