Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: OOP style question: Checking a value

by spq (Friar)
on Aug 29, 2006 at 21:32 UTC ( #570259=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: OOP style question: Checking a value
in thread OOP style question: Checking a value

Arggg - shouldn't have used OK in my OP I guess. Please see my response to the previous reply as well. I certainly agree that 'Figuring out what return code 3618 is' is a pain. Which is why I originally exported constants, such as ERROR, OK, NOT_FOUND, BAD_REQUEST, FORBIDDEN etc. Each method is (well, mostly will-be ;) documented with the possible codes it might set, should you be interested in finding out more details. This allowed things like:

# load test client $client = new MyModule({CLIENT_ID => 0}) ok($client && $client->response_code == CREATED, 'Loaded test client'); # foo test case 1 my $goodies = $client->foo({some => 'args'}); ok(defined $goodies && $client->response_code == OK, 'Got some kind of goodies from foo');

That's an example of the current API in a couple tests, checking response codes. Now, normally you would never need to do this in production code; if $client was actually a true value, then the client should have loaded fine and your object should be good to go. Hopefully the $goodies you get back, if any, are the goodies you want. If not, then you might want to go get the error message(s) (such as you would for DBI) or perhaps even determine the specific response code.

But now I'm participating in wandering off the subject. - lol - Let me try rewording my question. Lets assume that a side-effect of calling methods on an object of class Bar is that it changes the value of one of the objects attributes. The possible values are meaningful for some purpose and not arbitrary, only being selected from a limited, well defined set of possible values. While these values could be anything (numbers, documents, other objects), checking which value it is set to can be accomplished by comparing it to a defined set of English words - mnemonics. In the original version these words were exported from a central repository (that hides any magic away) and could be checked against the current state with == SOME_WORD. However, I want to combine a few things that are related and go together well with these word definitions and make them a class of their own, which my other classes may inherit from. This makes it 'impossible' to export the words as before, and as such alternate syntax's need to be considered.


Comment on Re^2: OOP style question: Checking a value
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://570259]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (17)
As of 2014-07-29 13:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (217 votes), past polls