Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl 6... do we need another vm?

by audreyt (Hermit)
on Sep 06, 2006 at 03:40 UTC ( #571368=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl 6... do we need another vm?

Pugs has targeted multiple VMs (JavaScript, Parrot, etc.) in the past, and we look forward to target more VMs in the future.

I've worked with CLR and YARV people to explore techniques in targetting them, and indeed both will probably become reasonable targets in their next release. I also plan to find some JVM people and see how much of JRE6 stuff we can use, but I'm not sure it's ready for Perl 6 yet.

As for Haskell: Pugs and Darcs have pushed GHC to improve its efficiency as a imperative VM, so it is becoming a really viable target for Perl 6.

However, with all that said, I think for the next few years, Perl 5 remains the most practical and robust VM to target, which is why Pugs now embeds Perl 5 by default. :-)


Comment on Re: Perl 6... do we need another vm?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://571368]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-07 08:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (87 votes), past polls