Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: shift vs @_

by Argel (Prior)
on Oct 02, 2006 at 20:26 UTC ( #575949=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: shift vs @_
in thread shift vs @_

I'm not going to claim this is better but it does allow you to meet your change management goals while still using the my()=@_ form.

sub blah { my( $foo, $bar, $baz, ) = @_; }


Comment on Re^2: shift vs @_
Download Code
Re^3: shift vs @_
by Argel (Prior) on Oct 02, 2006 at 20:39 UTC
    Actually, I think I will claim it is better. In theory it should be easier to notice changes since there is less clutter -- no leading "my" and no trailing "= shift" that someone eyeballing the code has to filter out so the variables themselves should stand out better.
      Perhaps, but consider the starting point of one argument:
      my( $foo, ) = @_;
      compared to:
      my $foo = shift;
      I use the shift approach because it gives me a clean starting point and lets me extend my methods (or subroutines) easily. Having said that, I try to avoid extending public methods and prefer to create new methods when appropriate. But perhaps I'm drifting away from the original question a little..

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://575949]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-03 18:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (55 votes), past polls