Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re^2: shift vs @_

by Argel (Prior)
on Oct 02, 2006 at 20:26 UTC ( #575949=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: shift vs @_
in thread shift vs @_

I'm not going to claim this is better but it does allow you to meet your change management goals while still using the my()=@_ form.

sub blah { my( $foo, $bar, $baz, ) = @_; }

Comment on Re^2: shift vs @_
Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: shift vs @_
by Argel (Prior) on Oct 02, 2006 at 20:39 UTC
    Actually, I think I will claim it is better. In theory it should be easier to notice changes since there is less clutter -- no leading "my" and no trailing "= shift" that someone eyeballing the code has to filter out so the variables themselves should stand out better.
      Perhaps, but consider the starting point of one argument:
      my( $foo, ) = @_;
      compared to:
      my $foo = shift;
      I use the shift approach because it gives me a clean starting point and lets me extend my methods (or subroutines) easily. Having said that, I try to avoid extending public methods and prefer to create new methods when appropriate. But perhaps I'm drifting away from the original question a little..

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://575949]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-11-29 12:28 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (750 votes), past polls