Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: shift vs @_

by Anonymous Monk
on Oct 03, 2006 at 08:27 UTC ( #576013=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to shift vs @_

Suppose you'd write a function like map, its first argument plays a very different role than the rest - which can be any length. Wouldn't it make sense to write:

sub my_map { my $special_thingy = shift; foreach my $item (@_) { apply($special_thingy, $item); } }
Starting with
my ($special_thingy, @list_of_items) = @_;
is a potentially costly operation, since you are copying everything else in @_ - and it is slightly different as you lose the aliasing. And writing:
sub my_map { foreach my $item (@_[1 ..$#_]) { apply($_[0], $item); } }
or
sub my_map { for (my $i = 1; $i < @_; $i++) { apply($_[0], $_[$i]); } }
is not something I fancy.


Comment on Re: shift vs @_
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://576013]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-26 07:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls