Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re^2: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

by stonecolddevin (Vicar)
on Oct 09, 2006 at 17:28 UTC ( #577230=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?
in thread Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

Perhaps I'm in need of some more in depth MVC research, but what kind of URL mapping are you talking about?

  • Comment on Re^2: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?
by perrin (Chancellor) on Oct 09, 2006 at 18:09 UTC
    Mapping URLs to methods in your class. Catalyst has a lot of funtionality for this, as you'll see if you browse the docs. Not sure about Jifty. CGI::Application has code for using either query strings (/catalog/product.cgi?rm=show) or a more REST-like approach (/catalog/product/show).

      I noticed Catalyst is pretty good to go as far as that goes. I'm thinking Catalyst is the way to go for me, Jifty seems a bit restricted. I could write a base framework for the small apps in C::A, then do all my big stuff with Catalyst. Thanks for the definition :-)

        URL dispatching is available with CGI::Application, it available through CGI::Application::Dispatch. That's the trend with CGI::Application: less weight built-in by default, but lots of options for extensions and plug-ins.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://577230]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2016-10-22 16:31 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (297 votes). Check out past polls.