Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

by stonecolddevin (Vicar)
on Oct 09, 2006 at 18:22 UTC ( #577245=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?
in thread Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

I noticed Catalyst is pretty good to go as far as that goes. I'm thinking Catalyst is the way to go for me, Jifty seems a bit restricted. I could write a base framework for the small apps in C::A, then do all my big stuff with Catalyst. Thanks for the definition :-)

meh.
  • Comment on Re^4: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?
by markjugg (Curate) on Oct 09, 2006 at 21:42 UTC
    URL dispatching is available with CGI::Application, it available through CGI::Application::Dispatch. That's the trend with CGI::Application: less weight built-in by default, but lots of options for extensions and plug-ins.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://577245]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (3)
As of 2016-12-10 14:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (163 votes). Check out past polls.