Re^2: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

in reply to Re: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?
in thread How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

Aha? Keeping an archive of material which is possibly infringing copyright is not copyright infringing? But C&P of freely published material without any copyright remark is copyright infringent?

You've got funny ideas.

--shmem

_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo.  G°\        /
                              /\_¯/(q    /
----------------------------  \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}

Comment on Re^2: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: How should Perlmonks deal with Plagiarism? by Argel (Prior) on Oct 10, 2006 at 16:41 UTC
That's why I called it a compromise. The point is to make it *not* readily or normally available but still allow higher ranking Monks to use it as a reference. Maybe only Janitors should have access? I'm just throwing ideas out because I know some people think it could be useful to have an archive to cross-reference new posts with.	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion