Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Separated JAPH/Obfuscation sections

by BooK (Curate)
on Feb 12, 2001 at 02:54 UTC ( #57799=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Separated JAPH/Obfuscation sections
in thread Separated JAPH/Obfuscation sections

I agree that there are already a lot of sections here, and I often don't know where to post my questions... (Yes, I sometimes post elsewhere than in Obfuscated Code.)

Clearly the Obfuscation section is not the place where most posts go. Anyway, I really feel that JAPH and Obfuscation are two different matters. I like to be surprised by the code I read in this section, and all too often alas, I know what a particular piece of code will print (and how) without reading it all (no I didn't read this one completely, but I am shocked by the good reputation it gets)...

But you are probably right when you say I should ignore posts that I find "not good enough". It's just that these JAPH are not what I (and I hope others) think obfuscation is... At first I tried -- to indicate my reprobation, then I tried critique (or worse). Now, I feel that JAPH have their own use, which is good, but is not the same as obfuscation (which would be something closer to artistic).

  • Comment on Re: Re: Separated JAPH/Obfuscation sections

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://57799]
help
Chatterbox?
[choroba]: setting in a BEGIN block?
[shmem]: choroba, yes

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-07-26 15:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I came, I saw, I ...
























    Results (396 votes). Check out past polls.