Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Could there be ThreadedMapReduce (and/or ForkedMapReduce) instead of DistributedMapReduce?

by tphyahoo (Vicar)
on Oct 20, 2006 at 17:51 UTC ( #579660=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Could there be ThreadedMapReduce (and/or ForkedMapReduce) instead of DistributedMapReduce?
in thread Could there be ThreadedMapReduce (and/or ForkedMapReduce) instead of DistributedMapReduce?

Yes, no doubt this is all true.

But my point is that by hiding my parallelization code in a threadedreduce, and putting the "meat" of my program in a "function builder" such as grepbuilder / mapbuilder / urlgrabbuilder -- that relies on threadedreduce or nonthreadedreduce -- I make experimentation easier, and maintenance easier.

I also write code that is easily portable to running on more than one thread, or more than machine. Just change one line, and see if you get an improvement. If there's no improvement, or things actually get worse, switch back to nonthreadreduce / nondistributedreduce.

These days, feels to me like I'm always second guessing myself with my thread code, rather than concentrating on the meat of my program.


Comment on Re^2: Could there be ThreadedMapReduce (and/or ForkedMapReduce) instead of DistributedMapReduce?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://579660]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-09-17 21:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (99 votes), past polls