Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Considering Super Search: the Sequel

by Albannach (Prior)
on Feb 15, 2001 at 22:22 UTC ( #58676=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Considering Super Search: the Sequel

All good ideas I think, but I think it should be minrep OR maxrep, as giving the searcher the ability to specify both would make it pretty easy to uncover the actual reputation which is currently hidden unless you spend that hard earned vote to find out...

Here's an OT thought: how about being able to spend a vote neutrally in order to uncover the reputation without affecting it? Now I'm confusing myself - if indeed reputation should be hidden, why is it revealed to voters?

--
I'd like to be able to assign to an luser


Comment on Re: Considering Super Search: the Sequel
Re: Re: Considering Super Search: the Sequel
by $code or die (Deacon) on Feb 16, 2001 at 04:52 UTC
    Regarding your last question, I think that people like to know how many people agree with them. E.g. if I upvote something, then I usually want to know if my vote made a difference. However, I also find that if I'm the one of the first to vote on something that I find really interesting, then I am sometimes disappointed to find that node only has 2 or 3 rep when I think it deserves much more.

    Not sure where any of this is leading. I'll stop rambling. But please don't "reap" me!!!

    $code or die
    Using perl at
    The Spiders Web

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://58676]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-12 19:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (240 votes), past polls