Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: ?: = Obfuscation?

by imp (Priest)
on Dec 01, 2006 at 16:30 UTC ( [id://587230]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to ?: = Obfuscation?

Like most things in perl the ternary operator can both help and hinder readability.

I prefer ternary for this:

# With ternary my $x = exists $hash{key} ? $hash{key} : 'default' # Without my $x; if (exists $hash{key}) { $x = $hash{key}; } else { $x = 'default'; }
I'm on the fence for this:
# With ternary my $x = $x > 5 ? 5 : $x + 1; # With if if ($x > 5) { $x = 5; } else { $x++; }
And dead set against this:
my $x = $y > 5 ? ($y = 0) : ($y = 1);

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: ?: = Obfuscation?
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Dec 01, 2006 at 20:31 UTC

    And dead set against this:

    my $x = $y > 5 ? ($y = 0) : ($y = 1);

    As you should be.

    my $x = ($y = $y > 5 ? 0 : 1);

    and

    $y = $y > 5 ? 0 : 1; my $x = $y;

    are much more readable.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://587230]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (8)
As of 2024-04-18 09:21 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found