Re: Reconciling multiple lists (similar to "merge" in CVS?)

I vote diff like module. Also, c, d and e on separate lines is the Right Way IMHO (they aren't the same thing afterall).

-- In Bob We Trust, All Others Bring Data.

Comment on Re: Reconciling multiple lists (similar to "merge" in CVS?)
Re^2: Reconciling multiple lists (similar to "merge" in CVS?) by japhy (Canon) on Jan 05, 2007 at 23:34 UTC
It looks helpful, especially the tabular output format. But it only handles two lists at a time. I'm trying to determine how to take DIFF(X,Y), produce two new modified lists, and then do something with those and Z to balance all three. Jeff `japhy` Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and `perl` hacker How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart	[reply]
Re^3: Reconciling multiple lists (similar to "merge" in CVS?) by belg4mit (Prior) on Jan 05, 2007 at 23:38 UTC
Text::Diff3, though it's hard to tell from the POD how useful it is. Algorithm::Merge looks promising though. UPDATE: Also, you'll have to bug tye to add diff3 support to Algorithm::Diff, or the Text::Diff author to alternately use Algorithm::Merge. `-- In Bob We Trust, All Others Bring Data.`	[reply]
Re^4: Reconciling multiple lists (similar to "merge" in CVS?) by japhy (Canon) on Jan 06, 2007 at 00:41 UTC
Well, there could be more than just three lists. There could be a dozen. Jeff `japhy` Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and `perl` hacker How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart	[reply]