Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^11: Perl Golf Ethics

by Jasper (Chaplain)
on Jan 09, 2007 at 14:52 UTC ( #593734=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^10: Perl Golf Ethics
in thread Perl Golf Ethics

I've said nothing of the sort.

you've implied it. On the one hand you claim to have enjoyed the contest while it was running, while you claim to have wasted your time, and have as much as said you wish you hadn't bothered. If I'm reading too much into what you've written, please ignore me.

The impression you have been giving everyone is that you think you wasted your time because you didn't find the magic I-IX formula. I don't think anyone understands where you're coming from.

I personally think the contest was biased against Ton. He'd discovered/invented the formula for another contest, and his solution was published. If that contest hadn't been run, he'd won by another three strokes!


Comment on Re^11: Perl Golf Ethics
Re^12: Perl Golf Ethics
by petdance (Parson) on Jan 09, 2007 at 14:56 UTC
    If I'm reading too much into what you've written, please ignore me.

    I would if not for you putting words in my mouth.

      Imagine someone got beaten by Roger Federer 6-0 6-0 6-0. Instead of saying "Well played Roger" or "You've got a great backhand" or "You were just too good for me today", the loser opened with "I started out at a distinct disadvantage from the start because you have a better quality tennis racquet" followed by "those two bad line calls I received in the third game left a very bad taste in my mouth" and finished with "I wish I hadn't bothered with this contest at all".

      To me, this long thread is mostly about simple human manners, respect and sportsmanship. You got beat 6-0 6-0 6-0 by Ton yet have shown him no respect, instead focusing on the bad taste in your mouth and the distinct disadvantages that you suffered. Ton has a rare gift evident from studying the post mortem: his opening 129 was made "before starting to think", he uncovered the surreal construct $$$_=$_ days before anyone else, and he found the *_=eval trick (which noone else found) in, wait for it, one minute and twenty seconds! You would go up in my estimation if you stopped focusing on your own feelings for a moment and instead congratulated Ton on a well-played game and for inventing the magic formula in the first place.

        You would go up in my estimation

        I'm not sure why you think that's a goal.

        instead focusing on the bad taste in your mouth

        People are like that, especially when told "You shouldn't feel that way."

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://593734]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-25 07:30 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (169 votes), past polls