Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

Re^3: RFC: Module namespace suggestion

by dragonchild (Archbishop)
on Feb 14, 2007 at 18:33 UTC ( #600018=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: RFC: Module namespace suggestion
in thread RFC: Module namespace suggestion

That sounds completely reasonable. Alternately, you could called it DBIx::Placeholder::Named, but your solution is just fine.

My criteria for good software:
  1. Does it work?
  2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

Comment on Re^3: RFC: Module namespace suggestion
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Module namespace suggestion
by izut (Chaplain) on Feb 14, 2007 at 18:37 UTC

    DBIx::Placeholder::Named is really fine. I'll refactor it soon to adapt the new name, then release it at CPAN.

    Thanks for your support.

    Igor 'izut' Sutton
    your code, your rules.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://600018]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-11-27 05:30 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (719 votes), past polls