Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re^3: RFC: Module namespace suggestion

by dragonchild (Archbishop)
on Feb 14, 2007 at 18:33 UTC ( #600018=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: RFC: Module namespace suggestion
in thread RFC: Module namespace suggestion

That sounds completely reasonable. Alternately, you could called it DBIx::Placeholder::Named, but your solution is just fine.

My criteria for good software:
  1. Does it work?
  2. Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Module namespace suggestion
by izut (Chaplain) on Feb 14, 2007 at 18:37 UTC

    DBIx::Placeholder::Named is really fine. I'll refactor it soon to adapt the new name, then release it at CPAN.

    Thanks for your support.

    Igor 'izut' Sutton
    your code, your rules.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://600018]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-03-24 10:42 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (300 votes). Check out past polls.