Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

by belden (Friar)
on Apr 14, 2007 at 00:33 UTC ( #610021=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

Modifying the symbol table can be useful: at work we used a similar trick to write Test::Resub. (Its use is slightly different from what you're doing, but you might like to give its source a quick read.)

If call_me_only_once() really should only be called once, then why not solve the problem there instead of in its caller? (You've already seen how to enforce single execution by scoping a variable outside the sub.)

Addressing the problem there would mean you wouldn't need to worry about bar() making a call to call_me_only_once(); presumably your program knows the answer to that question already.

--Belden

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://610021]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (12)
As of 2016-06-29 14:52 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My preferred method of making French fries (chips) is in a ...











    Results (384 votes). Check out past polls.