Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

by belden (Friar)
on Apr 14, 2007 at 00:33 UTC ( #610021=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

Modifying the symbol table can be useful: at work we used a similar trick to write Test::Resub. (Its use is slightly different from what you're doing, but you might like to give its source a quick read.)

If call_me_only_once() really should only be called once, then why not solve the problem there instead of in its caller? (You've already seen how to enforce single execution by scoping a variable outside the sub.)

Addressing the problem there would mean you wouldn't need to worry about bar() making a call to call_me_only_once(); presumably your program knows the answer to that question already.

--Belden


Comment on Re: Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://610021]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-09-04 17:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred temperature scale is:










    Results (143 votes), past polls