Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re: Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

by belden (Friar)
on Apr 14, 2007 at 00:33 UTC ( #610021=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

Modifying the symbol table can be useful: at work we used a similar trick to write Test::Resub. (Its use is slightly different from what you're doing, but you might like to give its source a quick read.)

If call_me_only_once() really should only be called once, then why not solve the problem there instead of in its caller? (You've already seen how to enforce single execution by scoping a variable outside the sub.)

Addressing the problem there would mean you wouldn't need to worry about bar() making a call to call_me_only_once(); presumably your program knows the answer to that question already.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://610021]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-02-26 03:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When it is dark outside I am happiest to see ...

    Results (316 votes). Check out past polls.