Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Proposal for a Perl 6 section?

by Errto (Vicar)
on Jun 20, 2007 at 22:02 UTC ( #622404=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Proposal for a Perl 6 section?
in thread Proposal for a Perl 6 section?

OT, but makes me wonder: will 6 make for better or worse obfu? The absence of a zillion predefined variables is a counter argument. But the modifiable grammar makes me dream of whole new scenarios that I... well, cannot even dream of!!
I'll bet the answer is "better". I mean circumfix operators, for heaven's sake. All sorts of bizarre regex things. That really funky roles/methods/properties access syntax. The main downside is that it might not be possible to do things like have working programs consisting entirely of lowercase words.


Comment on Re^4: Proposal for a Perl 6 section?
Re^5: Proposal for a Perl 6 section?
by blazar (Canon) on Jun 20, 2007 at 22:16 UTC
    That really funky roles/methods/properties access syntax.

    Just as funky as a $|++? ;-)

    I'll bet the answer is that the first few characters may exhibit some resistance to obfuscation, just to slide into complete utter unreadability if only good will be!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://622404]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-04 02:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (57 votes), past polls