Re^2: Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?


Don't ask to ask, just ask
	PerlMonks

Re^2: Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?

by HollyKing (Pilgrim)

on Jul 04, 2007 at 18:44 UTC ( #624926=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?
in thread Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?

Thanks for the ideas. I'll keep them in mind should I end up implementing this.

Owl looked at him, and wondered whether to push him off the tree; but, feeling that he could always do it afterwards, he tried once more to find out what they were talking about.

Comment on Re^2: Is there a better way to call fe(get\|set)round?

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://624926]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others romping around the Monastery: (4)

As of 2014-07-26 12:24 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:

Results (176 votes), past polls