Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: RFC: Suggestion for future version of perl

by Steve_p (Priest)
on Aug 06, 2007 at 15:54 UTC ( #630845=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RFC: Suggestion for future version of perl

As a developer, this would be nice. Unfortunately, this would break existing Perl code that is not strict or warnings clean. Actually, this might even break some core tests that rely on the fact that strict and warnings are not enabled.

Test your modules with bleadperl!

  rsync -avz rsync:// .
  ./Configure -des -Dusedevel -Dprefix=/path/to/test/perl
  make test
  make install

Now, please test you modules! If you have test failures that don't happen with Perl 5.8.8, send a simplified test case to

perlbug at

  • Comment on Re: RFC: Suggestion for future version of perl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Suggestion for future version of perl
by TimToady (Parson) on Aug 06, 2007 at 18:11 UTC
    And once again we see why Perl 6 had to take a "break everything all at once" approach. Perl 5 was not designed to evolve nearly as well as its author thought at the time... ;)

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://630845]
[Corion]: dazz: BTW, the following should work (no Image::Magick installed, so untested): open(my $fh, '<', \$jpegbuffer); $image->Read(file= > $fh);
[choroba]: Hm, it seems my humble contributions to CPAN pass their test suites with the PERL5OPT set

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-03-27 08:12 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (317 votes). Check out past polls.