Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Hanging Threads

by WalkingZero (Sexton)
on Aug 18, 2007 at 21:38 UTC ( #633527=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Hanging Threads
in thread Hanging Threads

That did correct the issue, so something with that reference is causing the issue. Is it possible that when the ->self function is called it's creating a lock on that memory space? I tried running the command you asked for the threads version, it doesn't produce any output. Thoughts on that one?


Comment on Re^4: Hanging Threads
Re^5: Hanging Threads
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Aug 18, 2007 at 21:52 UTC
    I tried running the command you asked for the threads version, it doesn't produce any output. Thoughts on that one?

    Um. It probably means you are using a core delivered version of threads? Which version of Perl are you using?


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
      v5.8.8 built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi

        If you have the interest in discovering more, given that you already have a solution, then you could try installing the latest CPAN version (1.63) and see if that also cures the problem with using threads->self().

        I have 1.63 installed and it's not an easy task to back that out, but if that cures the problem for you it's probably safe to conclude it is a old problem that has already been fixed.

        Strange that I never encountered it in the couple of years that I've been using 5.8.6/5.8.8, but then I always use threads->self->tid for identification purposes and have never had reason to obtain or reference a thread handle from within it's own thread procedure.

        As I mentioned, there is a certain logic to it. If the thread procedure contains a reference to itself, then you have a circular reference, and that is a well-known problem that prevents destructors being called.

        I wonder how they cured it? The usual method is to weaken the reference (artificially drop the reference count), but looking inside 1.63 they appear to mortalise before returning it--which I thought meant that the ref count was increased? But then, there is a bunch of the internal shenanigans that is tantamount to black magic as far as my understanding goes.


        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://633527]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-10-21 06:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (97 votes), past polls