Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Re: A proposal for improvements to Net::Ping

by Dragonfly (Priest)
on Mar 10, 2001 at 22:21 UTC ( #63499=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to A proposal for improvements to Net::Ping

Wow, I didn't know it was going to be quite this complex. ;-)

I like Tye's idea of possibly using a separate sub-module (Net::Ping::Dangerous? ;) that might incorporate some of the more elaborate approaches, and then letting Net::Ping know about it. I can see that some of my earlier trouble in using Net::Ping came from possibly not understanding the security implications of making system calls from a Perl module, even though this might be an effective approach.

Perhaps some of the biggest improvements could come from not just looking at the code, but also by adding a Troublesooting section to the Net::Ping documentation? If it was more specific that the module might behave unexpectedly because of 1. These 2. Possible 3. Conditions, there would probably not be as much confusion and questions from people using it.

In any case, this is a great thread, Falkkin, and you write some convincing arguments, as do AgentM and Tye. Great weekend reading. ;-)

Comment on Re: A proposal for improvements to Net::Ping

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://63499]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-10-10 10:00 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (255 votes), past polls