Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: keywords versus variables

by Gavin (Chancellor)
on Aug 30, 2007 at 17:06 UTC ( #636140=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to keywords versus variables

Less chance for spelling and copy and paste errors too if variable names are kept simple.

Comment on Re: keywords versus variables
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: keywords versus variables
by girarde (Hermit) on Sep 06, 2007 at 13:38 UTC
    True, but maintenance gets hard when they aren't evocative.
      but maintenance gets hard when they aren't evocative.

      Not so.

      Did you ever see music annotated with: "This_is_the_second_demi_semi_quavar_in_the_third_bar_of_fifth_stanza" (*).

      Or a resistor on a circuit diagram annotated: "This_is_the_470_ohmm_resistor_that_impedance_matches_the_output_of_the_third_stage_amplification_to_the_fourth_stage_feed_back_loop". (**)

      (*)I've no idea if that makes sense, but a musician would.

      (**)Ditto; but an electronics engineer would.

      Short variable names in context are just as clear to the maintanence programmer, and often more so, than long, overly descriptive ones--if the programmer has familiarised themselves with the purpose of the routine of which they are a part.

      And if he hasn't, he should not be maintaining the code.

      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://636140]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-10-10 16:37 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (257 votes), past polls