Perl: the Markov chain saw | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: Slow evolution of Perl = Perl is a closed Word (use)by tye (Sage) |
on Sep 01, 2007 at 06:20 UTC ( [id://636485]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Of course there are other issues besides source filters. If you read the PPI documentation (really, go ahead, do it now, just the first part, not the really gory details; I'll wait right here in front of the comma until you come back), it covers this fairly well though briefly, even linking to "our own" On Parsing Perl. Yes, even the non-source-filter issues can impact correctly parsing to the point of doing static analysis correctly. With the size of CPAN, that's a pretty good indicator that a PPI-based approach would be very effective for use in an IDE. Um. Maybe. PPI doesn't fail when trying to parse most of CPAN (that is, it doesn't notice that it has parsed something incorrectly to the point that it throws up its hands and declares that it can't go on). I have yet to see any claims as to how accurately or even completely PPI's parsing of all of CPAN actually is. I wouldn't be surprised to find that many people only rarely run into problems with PPI's parsing of the code that they usually deal with. In fact, if someone is burdened1 by the use of syntax highlighting when editting their Perl code, then their coding style will be somewhat skewed such that they avoid even reasonable constructs if they happen to confuse their syntax highlighter. So I wouldn't be surprised if they also avoid some things that would trip up PPI. If their syntax highlighter actually uses PPI (such as if they were to use a PPI-based IDE for editting their Perl code), then surely their style will be skewed toward things that PPI gets right. 1 Is that the right word? I can't find my thesaurus. My impression is that PPI, in practice, is good enough often enough that a PPI-based IDE could be successful if used on a new project (due to the feedback loop I noted above). The effectiveness of a PPI-based IDE when applied to an existing code base is certainly less certain, IMHO. - tye
In Section
Meditations
|
|