Re^5: Can we make $& better? (need)

[demerphq]

in reply to Re^4: Can we make $& better? (need)
in thread Can we make $& better?

Hrm, ill have to check the code in more detail, however I'm pretty sure that /g in list context copies the string *once*, wheras /g in scalar context doesn't copy it at all. The latter I know because i "fixed" it in 5.9.5 and then had to back out the fix because it caused an unacceptable slowdown.

However as far as I know you were correct, using capturing parens will cause a copy of the full string. Ill try to follow up with more details from the code when I have more time.

[tye]

BTW, my test was to change the string used in the match and then see if $1 also changed. That isn't a perfect test because it might be that the string is copied but $1 doesn't correctly use the copy made, for example. Here is a more polished version and two sets of results:

#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;

print "$] $^O\n";
for(  qw( s l sg lg )  ) {
    my $x= "-y1-y2-";
    my @y;
    $y[0]= $x =~ /(.\d)/
        if  's' eq $_;
    @y= $x =~ /(.\d)/
        if  'l' eq $_;
    $y[0]= $x =~ /(.\d)/g
        if  'sg' eq $_;
    @y= $x =~ /(.\d)/g
        if  'lg' eq $_;
    $x= ":1n:2n:";
    print "$_ ($1)\n";
}
__END__

5.006 MSWin32
s (y1)
l (1n)
sg (1n)
lg (2n)

5.008008 MSWin32
s (y1)
l (y1)
sg (1n)
lg (2n)

Which shows I'd missed the only "will copy" case in 5.6.