Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: Tiny Frameworks

by Anonymous Monk
on Sep 30, 2007 at 08:21 UTC ( #641762=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Tiny Frameworks

Two things
If you called your invention something like "a nice class", it fits much better.
Not to mention, your class is not even needed in modern languages, as it would be free.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Tiny Frameworks
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Sep 30, 2007 at 12:52 UTC

    I'm mainly trying to break the misconception in people's minds that frameworks have to be huge or bad (I hear both quite a bit). And you're right, that code would not be needed in modern languages. It's one of my greatest frustrations with Perl 5.


    New address of my CGI Course.

      You didn't break others' misconception, but your understanding is broken.

      So this one is not huge and bad, but tiny and not qualified.

      I may seen to be mean in other posts, but you know what, I totally understand your frustration towards Perl's non-OO. My XP points here is higher than the vast vast vast vast majority, but I left Perl for Python, so I can still feel sane.

      There wasn\t much need for me to be mean, but that's just the way of talking, however, call your 'framework' something like superclass or if you prefer big word, "methodology"... To argue the concept is useless. I watched the chatterbox a bit, I am glad most people around are still reasonable.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://641762]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-03-24 09:06 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (297 votes). Check out past polls.