in reply to
Re: How to answer "Perl is not secure" objections?
in thread How to answer "Perl is not secure" objections?
You didn't understand the sentence you quoted, not at all, and your own first sentence has absolutely no logic.
You assumed that OS is one thing, which is a bad assumption. Then you reasoned: if it is not secure to call A, then A is not secure.
The fact is that OS is not one thing, it is many things - many layers. It is insecure to call layer B if you bypass layer A that was supposed to provide security.
read my oppinion that I just provided as reply to one of tilly's post... really people should learn some philosophy and logic.