Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Finding a module to work on

by samtregar (Abbot)
on Oct 18, 2007 at 19:19 UTC ( #645826=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Finding a module to work on

You might enjoy working on XML::Validator::Schema. It has a few nice properties as a learning project:

  • It was coded originally using test-driven development, so there's lots of good tests and a decent harness for adding more. If you break it, you'll know.
  • It's meant to implement a published, stable spec. You won't need any creativity to find more stuff to do and you'll have a great source of test cases.
  • People are begging for more features and will shower you with praise when you deliver them.
  • You'll get to put some buzz-words on your resume - hot ones like XML, XML Schema, SAX, etc.


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Finding a module to work on
by dry_green_tea (Sexton) on Oct 21, 2007 at 13:02 UTC
    i wouldn't mind working on this myself. :-) Where do you suggest i begin?
      Great! I'd start by picking a small feature from the spec that XML::Validator::Schema doesn't support - some detail in the simple type system perhaps. First write a test case that fails, then implement the code necessary to get the test passing.


        Thanks! i'll get on to that as soon as i can. -- Alexis.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://645826]
[marto]: My German is very limited and Google translate really isn't helping with that one :P

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-01-19 13:39 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (218 votes). Check out past polls.