Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: How to document complex data structures?

by sfink (Deacon)
on Oct 21, 2007 at 18:57 UTC ( #646294=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to How to document complex data structures?

I think this is a very important question, because it's so critical to keeping things straight and Perl's syntax doesn't make it very obvious what's going on. I have many scripts that I can easily dive back into as a result of my data structure comments, and that I wouldn't have a hope of interpreting a month later without the comments.

I use something sort of similar to what you are proposing, except I don't use $placeholders, I keep it English-like, and I modify some of the syntax.

In brief, quoted strings are literals, unquoted strings are abstract data type descriptions (possibly defined explicitly later). (parens) mean a list, [brackets] mean an array ref, and {curlies} mean either a hash or hash ref (they're easily distinguished by a human, since it can only be a hash at the outermost level.) <angle brackets> mean an array ref with a fixed number of elements -- in other words, a tuple. If things get complicated, I use a simple word or phrase as a symbol that I expand later (using a colon to denote "is of type").

So for example:

# { student name => grade } my %grades = ( "Bob" => 3.2, "Alice" => 3.9 ); # { node name => [ child node ] } my %graph = ( A => [ "B", "C" ], B => [ "D" ] ); # { student name => { "age" => age, "grade" => GPA } } my %students = ( "Bob" => { age => 34, grade => 3.2 } ); # { name => <age, children, dirty flag> } # where children : { child name => 1 } my %table = ...; print "Bob is $table{Bob}->[0] years old.\n"; print "His children are ", join(" ", keys %{ $table{Bob}[1] }), "\n"; print "Is Guido his child? "; print ($table{Bob}[1]{Guido} ? "yes" : "no"), "\n"; # My version of your example # # Returns: [ stat chunk ] # where stat chunk : # { "originals" => { id => value }, # "changes" => { id => value }, # "means" => <mean of originals, mean of changes>, # "variances" => <variance of originals, variance of changes> # } # # or you could give a symbolic name to the { id => value } things.
This loses some nice properties of what you wrote -- eg, you can no longer use it as a direct template for constructing expressions. But I find that being able to drop into English for anything complicated is a good tradeoff for losing the additional rigor.

Then again, I do see the use of a rigorous description -- a couple years back, I wrote a tool that took a syntax somewhere between yours and mine and automatically applied it to a value to extract out the desired data. I won't describe the exact syntax, but it allowed things like:

my %map = ( a => 1, b => 3, c => 2 ); # Set @keys to ('a', 'b', 'c') # and @values to (1, 3, 2) match('{ @keys => @values }', \%map); my %map2 = ( a => { name => "Bob", children_ids => { Alice => 132, M +abel => 81 } }); # Set $etty to "Mabel" match('{ ? => { children_ids => { $etty => 81 } } }', \%map2);
and similar tricks. I found it quite handy, except that I really wanted it to declare the variables (@keys, @values, $etty) lexically in addition to initializing them, and I did this before I had heard of source filters. Or perhaps before they existed; I'm not sure.


Comment on Re: How to document complex data structures?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://646294]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-10-23 20:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (129 votes), past polls