Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re^3: Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?

by syphilis (Chancellor)
on Oct 23, 2007 at 10:17 UTC ( #646665=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?
in thread Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?

That's interesting. A lot of people I read answers from may be like that -- they have speciailized knowledge others don't, and reading their answers is itself a form of education. I come here to learn, because my skills are more ground-level. You make me realize that some people post precisely for people like me.

The general assumption is that QA forums (usenet groups, mailing lists, web forums, etc) provide a service for people who have questions that require answers. My view is that the *real* value of these forums, in fact, is that they provide a service for people who like to *answer* questions (for whatever reason).

Well ... that might be taking it a little too far. Let's just say that "it works both ways" ...

I *do* know that I've learnt much more from answering questions, than I have from asking questions :-)

  • Comment on Re^3: Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Should a Socratic Dialogue be attempted?
by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Oct 23, 2007 at 20:15 UTC
    Indeed. As nobull is often quoted over on c.l.p.misc:
    Get real! This is a discussion group, not a helpdesk. You post something -- we discuss its implications. If the discussion happens to answer a question you've asked, that's incidental. If you post a question that implies that you've got a problem finding answers to trivial questions in the manual, then it is perfectly reasonable for us to discuss how to do that.
    It's quite clear in my mind that much of the value in a site like Perlmonks isn't in getting an answer. It's in getting people thinking about how to solve the problem. At first glance, those might look like the same thing, but they really differ quite a bit. It's nice that the person asking gets help, but it'd be selfish to count on such a large resource to give up at one answer. The very broad array of ways in which programmers can solve problems lends naturally to discussion, and that's where deeper learning happens.

    We should especially be accustomed to TMTOWTDI in the Perl community, and discussion of options rather than a simple answer or a guided thought exercise seems the natural route to me.

      This thread is an example of what you're talking about, I think. At least it is for me. Yours is the third POV that is quite unlike what I had ever imagined. Many thanks!

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://646665]
[stevieb]: choroba my GPS home device is done, at least prototype v1 is. I'm just making sure all of my code does what it says now
[stevieb]: I test/prototype code on my Pi, then I migrate it over to Arduino when it's ready (if that's a better platform for what I'm doing). The whole RPi stuff was for learning at first, then it snowballed. I'm just trying to get my in-house CI...
[stevieb]: ...done, which obviously requires a specific hardware setup.
[stevieb]: I don't write tests for the lower-level distributions (ie. ICs, sensors etc) within those distributions, I have all tests in a master distribution which encompasess all of the sub-modules

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2017-06-25 22:58 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?

    Results (572 votes). Check out past polls.