Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Why should I use perl 5.10?

by doom (Deacon)
on Nov 30, 2007 at 23:34 UTC ( #654231=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Why should I use perl 5.10?
in thread Why should I use perl 5.10?

Really, that's an excellent summary, much more readable than the perl5 delta.

I hadn't realized that unicode handling had been sped up a bit: that sounds like one of the more practical advantages. I know at least one place that's still running on 5.6 perl because they saw a 30% slowdown in their attempt at upgrading to perl 5.8 (they didn't know about "use bytes", but cut them some slack, that's an easy thing to miss).

My personal favorite new feature would be the improvements to the regular expressions: it's now possible to do recursive regexps in a much neater way than the experimental features in 5.8 (no, I don't actually have a use for this, but I still think it's really neat...).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://654231]
help
Chatterbox?
[james28909]: i need to fix this issue with perlmonks. i keep having the issue of someone posting something that casues the page to be very wide.
[james28909]: is there some setting i am missing?
[GrandFather]: It's either lines that your browser won't split (no white space) or nodes with <pre> tags which ought to be code tags
[GrandFather]: I haven't noticed the problem for a while, but it can be hard to find the nasty node. If you do find it, consider it and with luck a janitor will fix it

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2017-05-24 00:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?